11Tracking

Package help

IEEPA Tariff Refund Status for a U.S. Import: Importer of Record, CAPE, and Who Gets Paid

A carrier may say a U.S. import may be eligible before CBP has accepted CAPE or issued a refund. Identify the IOR, filer, ACE/CAPE state, government recipient, and downstream payment.

A specific IEEPA tariff refund does not have one universal “refund status.” To understand a particular U.S. import, identify six separate things:

  1. The specific customs entry and the IEEPA duty on that entry.
  2. The Importer of Record (IOR).
  3. Who is authorized to submit or control the CAPE Declaration for that entry.
  4. The exact CAPE/ACE state that is actually visible.
  5. Who received, or is configured to receive, the government refund.
  6. If a carrier or other intermediary received government funds, whether that intermediary has reconciled and passed the money downstream.

These are different evidence states:

Carrier says the shipment may be eligible ≠ CAPE Declaration submitted ≠ CAPE accepted / claim number assigned ≠ government refund issued ≠ carrier or intermediary received government funds ≠ carrier credited or paid the downstream tariff payer ≠ downstream funds actually posted

This is a classification model, not a guaranteed chronological sequence for every entry. Some states may not be visible to the same person, and the responsible actor can change depending on who was the IOR, who filed the entry, and who is configured to receive the refund.

How to identify what stage your refund is actually in

Start with the strongest record you can verify in the system that owns that state. Do not upgrade a weaker carrier message into a stronger CBP or Treasury conclusion.

Evidence you can verify What it can establish What it does not establish Next useful action
UPS, FedEx, or DHL says an import may be eligible The carrier's own screening or operational process has identified a possible IEEPA refund case CAPE was submitted; CBP accepted it; Treasury issued money; the customer was paid Confirm the IOR and the carrier-specific filing path for that entry
CAPE Declaration submitted An authorized CAPE submission was transmitted for the entry The declaration passed CBP validation or was accepted The IOR or filing broker should inspect the CAPE result in the appropriate ACE/CAPE record
CAPE accepted / a CAPE claim number exists CBP accepted the administrative CAPE record in whole or in part after applicable validation Treasury issued a refund; a carrier received funds; the downstream payer was paid Check the next official ACE refund state rather than treating the claim number as payment
ACE shows “Sent to Treasury” CBP's refund process has moved to the Treasury-payment stage reflected by that report Treasury has necessarily issued the funds or the funds have posted downstream Continue with the official ACE refund record
ACE shows “Treasury Issued” The government refund has been issued to the configured government-refund recipient A carrier has completed its own reconciliation; the original tariff payer has received money Identify the government recipient and, if it is an intermediary, move to that intermediary's reconciliation record
ACE REV-613 or a refund record shows ACH rejected because enrollment is missing A government-payment-routing rejection or delay caused by incomplete ACH refund enrollment CAPE eligibility was denied, or the underlying refund claim was rejected on its merits Use the current CBP ACH-enrollment path, notify the CBP ACH refund support address specified in the current guidance, then monitor the official ACE refund record
A carrier confirms it received the government refund That carrier has received the government-side funds for the relevant branch The carrier has already credited or paid the downstream tariff payer Follow that carrier's own reconciliation/disbursement process
A carrier credit or refund record exists The carrier has taken a downstream accounting step The money has necessarily posted to the final bank/card/account destination Verify the destination account or payment record
The downstream credit actually posted The money reached that downstream payment destination Every charge on the original import invoice was refundable as IEEPA duty Reconcile the amount by charge type; do not assume unrelated duties or private fees were included

The important rule is simple: eligibility is not acceptance, acceptance is not government payment, and government payment to an intermediary is not the same as payment to the downstream customer.

Who is the Importer of Record, and why does it matter?

The fact that you paid a UPS, FedEx, or DHL tariff invoice does not by itself prove that you were the Importer of Record.

The IOR is an entry role, not merely “the person who economically paid the bill.” For a specific import, establish the IOR from authoritative customs-entry evidence or the carrier/broker customs record for that entry. A CBP Entry Summary / Form 7501 can be relevant evidence where it exists, and an authorized ACE user or carrier customs team may have the corresponding entry record.

Do not send that private record to 11Tracking. Inspect the IOR field yourself in the official record, or ask the carrier/broker to identify which party was recorded as IOR for the entry.

If you cannot establish the IOR, do not jump directly to “I should file CAPE.” First resolve the actor identity.

Who may file CAPE versus who receives the government refund

CBP's current CAPE guidance separates the filer from the refund recipient.

For the current administrative CAPE process, a CAPE Declaration may be submitted by:

  • the Importer of Record associated with the entry summaries; or
  • the broker that filed those entry summaries.

That does not mean a filing broker automatically becomes the government refund recipient.

The government-payment side is separate. CBP's current guidance can route consolidated refunds to the IOR or to a validly designated party under the applicable refund-payment setup. A single CAPE Declaration or claim is also not necessarily matched one-for-one to a single government payment.

Form 4811 is not the CAPE submission form

Do not use Form 4811 as if it were a CAPE claim form.

CAPE filing answers: who may submit the IEEPA refund declaration for this entry?

Form 4811 / refund designation answers a different question: where may an eligible government refund be directed under the applicable CBP refund-payment setup?

A broker may therefore have authority to file a CAPE Declaration for an entry it originally filed without automatically becoming the party that receives the government refund.

What “CAPE accepted” and a claim number actually mean

CBP's current Phase 1 guidance says that when a CAPE Declaration is accepted in whole or in part after validation, CBP assigns a unique CAPE claim number.

That is an accepted administrative CAPE record. It is not evidence that:

  • Treasury has issued the refund;
  • the refund has reached the IOR or designated recipient;
  • UPS, FedEx, or DHL has received government funds;
  • a carrier has reconciled the original tariff payment;
  • the downstream customer has received a credit.

If you have ACE access through the appropriate role, use the current ACE refund reports for stronger payment-state evidence. Current CBP reporting distinguishes states such as “Sent to Treasury” and “Treasury Issued.” Do not replace those specific states with a generic “approved” label.

Phase 1 and Phase 2 do not mean every old IEEPA entry uses the same path

CBP's published CAPE process has been phased. The Phase 1 guidance establishes the main administrative path for qualifying entries within its stated liquidation conditions. Phase 2 added a scoped class of reconciliation-flagged entries; it did not turn every historical IEEPA-paid entry into the same self-service CAPE case.

So this evidence is not enough by itself:

“IEEPA duty was charged, therefore my entry is definitely in CAPE.”

If the entry falls outside the currently published administrative phase rules, or the case has moved into a finally-liquidated/protest/litigation-sensitive branch, stop using this page as a filing guide. That does not mean there is necessarily no remedy; it means the ordinary CAPE-status model here no longer answers the legal question.

What happens if the government refund went to a carrier?

Carrier workflows are not interchangeable. Use only the branch that matches the carrier and the actual IOR/filer evidence.

Carrier Current carrier-specific evidence What not to infer
UPS UPS provides an IEEPA eligibility lookup. For the eligible UPS-as-IOR branch described in its current guidance, UPS says it files and, after receiving CBP funds, reconciles the refund to the original tariff payment. A UPS “may be eligible” result is not CAPE acceptance. Do not assume UPS is the IOR merely because UPS billed you. UPS also separates IEEPA tariff refunds from its own administrative, brokerage, and disbursement charges.
FedEx FedEx says that for eligible Phase 1 entries where it served as the customs broker, it filed CAPE unless the customer used the stated opt-out/delay path. FedEx also provides a portal state showing whether FedEx has received a government refund for the relevant branch. FedEx filing authority does not automatically make FedEx the government refund recipient when the customer is the IOR. A portal state showing FedEx received government funds is not proof that the customer has already been paid.
DHL DHL separates cases where DHL was the IOR from cases where the customer was the IOR. In the DHL-as-IOR branch, DHL describes filing eligible claims and later reconciling government funds downstream; customer-IOR cases follow a different route and may involve broker assistance. Do not transfer DHL's IOR, filing, fee, or reconciliation rules to UPS or FedEx. For CAPE filing authority and Form 4811 payment designation, rely on CBP's federal guidance rather than treating a carrier explanation as the controlling rule.

If a carrier says it has received government funds, ask a narrower question next: Has the carrier completed the reconciliation or credit for the specific original tariff payment? That is a different record from the government payment itself.

What an IEEPA refund does not automatically include

The February 20, 2026 action ending the specified additional ad valorem IEEPA duties did not erase every other import charge.

An IEEPA refund does not automatically mean a refund of:

  • Section 232 duties;
  • Section 301 duties;
  • other separately authorized tariffs, including Section 122 measures where applicable;
  • ordinary or base customs duties;
  • every tax;
  • brokerage charges;
  • administration charges;
  • disbursement or advancement charges;
  • every carrier service fee.

Read the original entry and invoice by charge object and legal/contractual source. Do not treat the total amount paid to a carrier as one undifferentiated “tariff.”

This page does not calculate the correct tariff, choose an HTS/HS code, determine origin or customs value, or decide individualized refund entitlement.

If the authentic government assessment itself looks wrong, use Customs Duty or Import Tax Amount Looks Wrong instead.

CAPE does not release a live package

CAPE is a customs-entry financial and administrative refund process. A CAPE submission, acceptance, or refund state does not by itself prove that:

  • a live package was released by customs;
  • physical custody changed;
  • the carrier received the package;
  • tracking changed;
  • customs physically moved the shipment.

If your real problem is “the customs charge was paid or prepaid, but the package still is not released”, or you were charged again, use Customs Fees Paid but Package Not Released or Charged Again.

What to do if your entry does not fit the normal CAPE branch

Do not force an entry into the ordinary CAPE model if the authoritative record shows that it is outside the current published phase conditions or in a legally sensitive finally-liquidated/protest/litigation branch.

For that situation:

  1. preserve the official entry and ACE/CAPE records without posting them publicly;
  2. check current CBP guidance for the exact entry state;
  3. if the unresolved question is a protest, litigation, or individualized legal entitlement issue, use an appropriate licensed customs professional or qualified legal adviser.

This page does not recommend a lawsuit, protest theory, deadline strategy, or legal filing. It also does not conclude that an entry outside the ordinary CAPE branch has no possible remedy.

What to do next

Use the primary unresolved object, not the word “tariff,” to choose the next guide:

For broader cross-border help, use the International Shipping guide.

Protect your customs and refund data

IEEPA refund activity creates a useful scam target. Verify CAPE activity through official ACE/CBP channels and carrier activity by independently opening the carrier's official site or account. Do not trust an unsolicited message merely because it mentions a real refund program, entry number, carrier, or tariff.

Do not send or upload to 11Tracking:

  • ACE credentials;
  • Entry Summary / Form 7501;
  • importer identifiers;
  • EIN or SSN;
  • CAPE claim numbers;
  • broker powers of attorney;
  • Form 4811 data;
  • carrier account credentials;
  • bank or ACH details;
  • private invoices.

11Tracking and USTracking can help explain the meaning of non-sensitive evidence you already see, but they cannot identify the IOR from private customs systems, access ACE, file CAPE, amend an entry, receive a government refund, force a carrier to pass through a refund, contact CBP or a carrier for you, determine individualized legal entitlement, litigate or protest an entry, or guarantee refund timing.

Official sources and actions

Last reviewed: 2026-08-25